Rockin’ Your Moves
Each author is gifted with a distinct method and way of thinking that can
be seen throughout their literary pieces. Unless an individual has copied off
another student, which is totally unethical and illegal, their piece of work will
never be written in the same manner as another, even if the assignment and
rubric is exactly the same. The steps and processes an author takes to write
their piece is known as their “moves.” How an individual chooses to format, punctuate,
state, elaborate, or argue their topic or ideas are all an essential aspect to
their unique moves. Similarly to Jackie Chan’s move with the karate kick or
Michael Jackson’s move with moon-walking and crotch grabbing, each writer
approaches their different pieces of literature in their own distinct way.
In the appendix, “The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing: ‘They Say I
Say,’’’ the authors Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst elaborate
on some of the most common moves a writer utilizes when expressing and
communicating their piece. The article, “Murder! Rhetorically Speaking” by
Janet Boyd, used many of the same techniques Graff, Birkenstein, and Durst
identified. One move that Boyd constantly used was “Making What ‘They Say’ Something
You Say.” This technique was significant when Durst attempted to make his ideas
and thoughts into a statement rather than an opinion. By attending closely to
the author’s perspective and experiences, it allows the audience to understand
more clearly the author’s arguments. The author’s point of view was a foundation
and basis in which he was able to elaborate later on a more reasoned and
evidenced-based perspective. Another move that was continuously implemented
was, “Introducing Standard Views.” When the author states, “…Am I right that it
starts with you arriving at the crime scene, and that you wrote in first
person?” (86). The author elaborates on common situations most individuals experience
and relates it back to the audiences’. This technique is used to conclude that
not only does the person reading write a specific piece with similar
conventions compared to the author, but so does all the other audiences involved.
“Introducing Standard Views” standardizes certain writing procedures.
Another move that Boyd uses is, “Introducing Quotations,” and “Explaining
Quotations.” Both these moves are most commonly practiced in academic writing.
In order to provide evidence and argue your point accurately, you must provide
research and data to support your claims. The author in, “Murder! Rhetorically
Speaking,” frequently refers back to his student’s work to clarify his claim. Introducing sources with phrases such as: “x
states…, according to x…, or in x’s views…,” the author can effectively present
who they are referring to. By explaining quotations with expressions such as: “x’s
point is…, x is saying…, in other words x believes…,” the author can clarify
the importance and effectiveness of the quote. Finally, a common move the author uses is, “Signaling
Who Is Saying What.” Relating back to introducing and explaining quotations, this
method is crucial in referring back to who the quote pertains to. This builds
ethos by crediting reliable individuals and allowing the audience to perceive
that your argument is accurate and trustworthy.
Although the appendix “The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing: ‘They
Say I Say’’’ provided a thorough list of moves that authors regularly utilize,
there are numerous amounts of techniques each author uses that are harder to standardize.
For example, in the article, ““Murder! Rhetorically Speaking,” the author made
constant use of the italics to emphasize certain important terms or to define
vocabulary. This move would be defined as “Diction Emphasis!” This technique is
very effective, because it allows a way to stress or draw attention to the
importance of the word or elaborate on a certain idea. It also permits the
author to add his voice into the article, allowing the audience to better
understand his point of view. Another move this author uses is constantly referring
to the audience directly. For instance, the author stated, “Or perhaps you,
like Chelsea Vick, felt mounting drama to be the most persuasive approach”
(95). This technique, “The Classroom Method,” was used throughout the article
and was very effective in allowing the audience to feel a deeper connection
with the author as an educator. The whole article felt like a lesson rather
than a literary reading. Although, as students, it was essential to annotate
and evaluate this piece of literature, the author constantly referred to the
audience, students, in second person, creating direct dialogue. Similarly, the
move, “’Let’s Try This’ Exercises,” was a method the author regularly used to
keep the audience active. Boyd’s technique was effective in keeping his
audience attentive and active. As opposed to other boring and dull readings,
the technique of keeping the audience active was much more unique and made the time
spent reading interesting. He asked his audience to, “Visualize yourself in
your new occupation, recall the “five facts,” and then take five minutes to
write up your findings as a coroner would...” (87). Through this method, it
becomes much easier to understand the author’s purpose and reasoning by
applying it to yourself.
Another move, known as “Review…Did
You Know?” was used to allow the audience to see if they comprehended what was
just explained. He also used many
rhetorical questions and elaborated on those thereafter. He asked questions
such as, “So what did you include in your eulogy? Of the five facts, you
probably mentioned…” (91). These questions were effective in expounding upon
the topic. It gets the reader to think and compare their answers to the most
common/frequent ones. It also gets an audience to think about the purpose of why a
certain idea is being explained and what its purpose is. Finally, the author
made use of subheadings to introduce the topics. This method, known as, “The Process
You Will Be Familiarized With,” gives the audience an idea of what practices
will be implemented and what the focus is of the next section. To be aware
means to be educated!
Each author is distinct in their own way and this is shown through each
of their textual literary works. Their distinctive actions implemented in their
works are known as their “moves.”
I really like how you mention the different moves in the first paragraph, mentioning format and even punctuation, since this shows how different moves can be. Each argument you presented - how effective the writer was in using a certain move - was well explained and thorough, supporting your claims perfectly. I have to definitely agree with your statement about how there are numerous amounts of techniques that are a lot harder to standardize. Also, with the Murder! piece where you mention how it felt like a lecture, is spot on a definitely a move that was essential to the piece and how the author was trying to communicate to the reader. Overall, good job!!
ReplyDelete